Are you one of the TSA’s unwitting accomplices?

by Christopher Elliott on August 12, 2012

I would have given anything to be a fly on the wall at the Gallup Organization last week after it released a poll that suggested more than half of all Americans believe the TSA is doing a “good” or “excellent” job.

The survey, which Gallup claims is self-funded and carries no ideological agenda, is sure to be used by the agency assigned to protect America’s transportation systems to defend its current practices.

But the fly on the wall would have probably seen another side of the story: The hand-wringing and consternation among Gallup’s pollsters, who surely must darken the door of an airport every now and then. They must have known the results would be used to promote more of the nonsense we’ve seen since 2001.

They must have felt like unwitting accomplices.

Even though Gallup’s survey, and others like it, have been criticized, they haven’t been discredited. And because they haven’t been fully debunked, you can be sure the stats will emerge in a post on the TSA’s blog or in a letter to the editor from an agency apologist or in a Congressional report, in which the agency requests additional funds to “secure” America’s borders.

The TSA relies on the work of unwitting accomplices like pollsters who ask irresponsible questions and tourists who offer uninformed answers to a survey. Without them, convincing the flying public that these allegedly unconstitutional airport searches are for their own good, would be considerably more difficult. And perhaps even, impossible.

But others are helping the TSA, too. Just last week, the White House pulled a petition that asked the president to require TSA to “follow the law.” If the petition had received 25,000 signatures, the administration would have been obligated to publicly respond. The petition was 9,000 signatures short when it was deleted without explanation.

It’s easy to understand why the Obama administration wouldn’t want to make a public statement about the legal status of the TSA. The agency has repeatedly thumbed its nose at the rule of law, the courts and the constitution, say its critics. During an election year, there’s no up-side to saying anything.

Help also comes from the mainstream press, which often doesn’t see what the big deal is with an agency that scans, prods, pats-down and interrogates the people it’s supposed to protect. When TSA agents show up at NFL games and subway stations, reporters and editors don’t understand what the fuss is about. They may even believe that questioning the TSA is unpatriotic.

Mostly, though, it isn’t what they write and broadcast, but what they choose not to cover, that’s problematic. When an agency critic claims to have foiled the TSA’s controversial full-body scanners, it only takes a warning to get the press to back off.

Has anyone ever bothered to count the number of full-time journalists covering the TSA? I’ll wait here while you do the math.

We could spend all day pointing fingers, but as my grandmother used to say, when you point one finger there are at least three pointing back to you. See, Gallup’s disastrous poll didn’t happen in a vacuum; there were 1,014 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, who helped the cause.

Those of us who write about this deeply troubled agency found ourselves asking: Who are these people?

Now that I think about it, that’s not hard to answer. They are our neighbors, friends and relatives who get their information from the daily newspaper, the evening news, the mainstream news website. They are soothed by the words of a commander-in-chief who looks the other way while an entire federal agency flouts the law.

And obviously — and perhaps most importantly — they haven’t suffered at the hands of a TSA agent. Their rights and their dignity haven’t been violated. They haven’t been bullied, harassed, lied to, and haven’t had their personal belongings pilfered.

At least not yet.

  • cjr001

    Do you know the methods used in Gallup polls? They actually are quite legitimate, so I wouldn’t discredit them right away. However, it still is true that the poll results don’t reflect the true opinion of frequent flyers who are democrats (which is what people seem to be thinking is ‘everyone’) but rather everyone, including those who haven’t and might never fly.

    • cjr001

      Another imposter. Stay classy, trolls.

      I suppose I should be thankful at least that this one hasn’t gone off with borderline racist and/or bigoted remarks yet, as a previous one did?

      • http://tsanewsblog.com/214/news/history-repeats-itself-with-tsas-strip-search-tactics/ Lisa Simeone

        cjr001, real cjr001, the person who keeps trying to impersonate you is now using IP address 71.202.233.180, in San Pablo, California; this time he’s using the email address cjr001@bobmail.info. Last time it was somewhere else, I forget where. In any case, I am deleting his comment and banning him from posting. (Until he finds another computer at another IP address and starts posting again.)

        • cjr001

          Thanks. I know it’s a never-ending battle and nothing but headaches.

  • ThisBlogIsaWasteofTime

    stop writing that the White House pulled the petition without explanation. That is A LIE. It was pulled after 30 days when it didn’t get enough signatures. Even the guy who created the petition (he’s from the Cato Institute) admits it didn’t hit the signature threshhold in the required 30 days.
    There’s enough wrong with the TSA without creating ridiculous conspiracy memes that are baseless.
    it also shows you cannot cover “the agency with fairness, balance and accuracy” as your little blurb suggests. When the facts don’t match your opinions, you lie. How is that fair, balanced or accurate?
    You people are as useless as the TSA now because you both make up crap and expect us to believe it.

    • http://www.facebook.com/sommer.gentry Sommer Gentry

      That post has been corrected. I think that the expiration time of the petitions is ambiguously stated on the website: “25000 signatures by August 9, 2012″. Nowhere did the petition website say at what time on August 9 it would expire (11am – while people were still firing up their blogs trying to get the last 2000 signatures).

      Also, the petition website went down for at least one full day during the petition’s time limit. In particular, the website was taken down on the day that Wired wrote an article urging people to sign the petition, which would probably have made up the difference for margin of victory. But then again, the petition that over 30,000 people signed calling for an end to the TSA’s disgusting reign of molestation and carcinogenic nude-imaging was answered in the most insulting and power-hungry tones by the very same kiddie-porn-loving John Pistole who started all the abuse in the first place. So, we never had much hope for change from that petition in any case.

    • http://tsanewsblog.com/214/news/history-repeats-itself-with-tsas-strip-search-tactics/ Lisa Simeone

      “ThisBlogIsAWasteofTime,” I’m getting tired of your sockpuppetry and will start deleting your comments if you keep it up. I’ve already told you this before. Sock puppetry is dishonest.

      This is the 4th phony internet moniker you’ve used; the others are WillyG, AnActualFlyer, and TruthTeller. Your IP address is 67.84.81.126 and is in Hopewell Junction, NY.

      I already updated the White House petition post earlier this morning. Have you bothered to read it? Or do you just enjoy tossing out false accusations?

      • cjr001

        You’ve got far more patience than I. Anything beyond a 2nd moniker (with a close examination of posting history) would’ve been a ban, and I certainly wouldn’t have bothered with a 2nd warning, if even a 1st.

Previous post:

Next post: