Knives, bats, and clubs on planes — oh no!

by Charles Leocha on March 9, 2013

TSA knives allowed
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) took action in paring its forbidden items list a bit — a tiny bit. Passengers will soon be allowed to carry on small knives and some sporting equipment that after years of careful research and untold hours of committee deliberations have been determined to be non-threatening in terms of airline security.

These new rules are simply embarrassing and raise questions about whether those on this review committee are dealing with reality. At most, they are baby steps in the right direction. To some, they are a breach of personal security.

This action, without any explanation of its philosophy, rationale, or significant benefits, is generating more protests than plaudits.

The Consumer Travel Alliance (CTA) has been pressing for changes to the TSA forbidden items list for years. CTA efforts are predicated on changes that have taken place since 9/11.

In testimony before Congress, CTA has stated that:

• Cockpit doors are fortified
• Every passenger goes through a check against the terrorist watch list.
• Pointless searches for items that cannot be used to take over the cockpit of a plane or be used as an explosive should be discontinued.
• Eliminating searches for these items that do not threaten an aircraft will save millions of dollars annually.

Unfortunately, this effort by TSA to streamline security screening and focus on real threats will run into a public relations buzz saw. Those favoring such changes will be disappointed by such halfway actions and those favoring the current system will wail about personal safety.

Flight attendants are already up in arms.

When TSA spokesperson David Castelveter said, “There’s still an emotional attachment to that matter,” he hit the nail on the head. He was referring only to razor blades and box cutters, but certainly knives stir similar passions.

If the TSA had initially announced changes in forbidden items by allowing sporting equipment and tools like screwdrivers and wrenches, there wouldn’t have been much visceral reaction. But, knives and box cutters push emotional buttons.

Since the actual screening process is not changing at all, passengers might now feel less safe after dealing with the same security line hassles. Plus, flight attendants and air marshals will be upset.

Some see the TSA’s actions as designed to make their own work easier, while putting passengers and crew at risk. The opportunity to couple these forbidden item changes with benefits to the public with other dramatic security improvements has been lost.

Now the TSA is faced with the worst of both worlds.

The effects of this new rule may end up slowing security lines rather than speeding them along, costing more money rather than less, and adding a new level of confusion. Starting on April 25th, some baseball bats will be forbidden. If you can believe it, TSA security personnel will have to stop and measure them.

And just how TSA agents will begin measuring the size of items to the tenth-of-an-inch (in a country that has officially refused to adopt the metric standards) and install scales to weigh plastic bats and allow them aboard should they weigh less than 24 ounces, hasn’t been disclosed.

Here is the TSA announcement as it appeared on the TSA Blog.

TSA established a committee to review the prohibited items list based on an overall risk-based security approach. After the review, TSA Administrator John S. Pistole made the decision to start allowing the following items in carry-on bags beginning April 25:

• Small Pocket Knives – Small knives with non-locking blades smaller than 2.36 inches and less than 1/2 inch in width will be permitted
• Small Novelty Bats and Toy Bats
• Ski Poles
• Hockey Sticks
• Lacrosse Sticks
• Billiard Cues
• Golf Clubs (Limit Two)

Friends sent me Facebook rants about the fact that people can now bring knives and baseball bats on the plane, but they can’t bring on a cup of coffee.

However, I have some other questions.

Why is a larger-than-7-inch wrench more dangerous than a pool cue?
Why is marijuana (including both medical and non-medical) on the no-fly list?
Why is a larger-than-7-inch screwdriver forbidden when a ski pole is not?
Why is a larger-than-7-inch pair of pliers forbidden?
Why is a novelty bat, exactly the same weight and length as a billy club, permitted while the billy club is not? Aesthetics?
Why is a fencing foil considered dangerous when a hockey stick is not?

Anyone who has seriously discussed material changes to the TSA forbidden items list with pilots, flight attendants, and the public knows the emotional reactions that allowing knives on planes generate. The TSA should hardly have been blind-sided.

What could have been a positive modification to our airport security system, complete with savings of money and time and no decrease in real security, is on its way to becoming a public relations disaster. I’m expecting the TSA to backtrack.

Whatever path the TSA chooses, they need to present it as a way forward, not a step backwards. These kinds of changes need to be vetted carefully with the most important stakeholders in this process — airline crews, the flying public, and the TSA.

  • Dolt

    After thinking on this for a few days, I’m starting to wonder if this was not just the TSA doing another arbitrary policy change with no real thought put into it, or if it was actually very thoughtful and planned out. Not to turn into a crazy conspiracy nut or anything… but really, why go straight for the relaxing standards on knives first? Knowing full well the majority of the over-reacting public would go ape- over “ZOMG KNIVES!”. They didn’t relax policy on nail clippers, taking shoes off, liquids, gropes, snow globes or the countless other items that would have been widely accepted and applauded. Instead they go right for knives and bats. I’m all for the knives and bats personally, but I know how insane and irrational people will – and are – being about it. It just makes me wonder if this wasn’t designed to be used later by saying that they tried to relax the policy but “the public made it clear that they want this level of security”. Just the thought of this very real possibility makes me irritated.

    • frostysnowman

      Scarily, I think you might have a point. I didn’t even think about that possibility until I read your comment. I wouldn’t put it past the Thousands Standing Around. Ugh.

    • TSAisTerrorism

      Like frosty, I too had not considered this very real possibility.

      However, the idiots running TSA really aren’t that cunning, or smart. You are. Which is why such a possibility makes sense to us.

      Having worked with TSA at the managerial level in my previous life, it really is outright stupidity. That’s really all it is. They are the largest collection of morons ever assembled in one place.

  • Susan Richart

    I have no issue with the knives, but I do have a problem with golf clubs and bats, even small ones, being allowed on board.

    There is an upside to this policy: it has made the TSA look as incompetent as it truly is. When even AFSers are calling for Pissy’s removal, it can’t be all bad.

  • Susan Richart

    Then along comes on Jon Adler representing FAMs and saying:

    TSA’s “primary concern, and their only concern, is to protect the cockpit to make sure the planes aren’t turned into missiles,” he complained. “Traveling Americans are expendable, disposable and otherwise irrelevant to air travel safety.”

    So now we know exactly how DHS/TSA/FAMs feel about passengers. Are you surprised? I’m not.

    Someone needs to put this quote on a tee shirt.

    • TSAisTerrorism

      One wonders: did Mr. Adler not get the memo that passengers are the 20th layer of Security Baklava?

      They have layers! Layers, my friend!

  • eleanordew

    I have to wonder — who travels with only two golf clubs?

    • nveric

      Two-Club golfing is not practical. Whereas, Four-Club golfing is in the challenge of actually adjusting your swing to make shots with the limit of four. Normal golfing uses the same swing but with the various clubs doing the work of adjusting for distance. Four-Club golfing forces one to think more in applying the required force instead.

  • Pat Downe

    Future tense! “Passengers will soon be allowed to…” It is important to remember that nothing has changed yet. TSA announced several times that they would not fondle children. To my knowledge they still do.

  • http://twitter.com/litbrit Deborah N. Tornello

    This latest manifestation of TSA ridiculousness is so unbelievably stupid–even for them–I actually wondered if it might be satire when I first heard about it.

    It was meant to speed up/streamline screening, but pray tell me, how is that possible when they’re now going to have to issue tape measures to the Braintrust in Blue, and have them ensure the blade is “no more than 2.36 inches long” and “1/2 ” at its widest point”, plus the grip may not be “molded” (what the hell does *that* mean? Not ergonomically-shaped? One finger indentation but not four?)

    And oh my, it’s going to be sweet joy at the checkpoints when someone sails through with two potentially-skull-crushing golf clubs but a pocket knife with a 2.37″ blade–rules are rules!–gets confiscated.

    Furthermore: what kind of knife *doesn’t* have a locking blade? A blade that doesn’t snap firmly into place is a blade that’s going to cut up the user something cruel.

    It has to be satire. It has to be. There is no way any of this makes any sense unless it’s the stealth release of new Monty Python sketch after all these years. Now that *would* be good news.

    • Daisiemae

      Braintrust in Blue! I love it! And I love your idea about Monty Python. I’m going to write a letter to my representatives today and demand that John Cleese be appointed the new head of TSA!

      TSA must be abolished and replaced with the Knights that say “Nee!”

  • Susan Richart

Previous post:

Next post: