Disabled woman beaten bloody thanks to TSA

Because TSA News was down for a while due to IT problems, I didn’t get to post this story here last month. By now, many people have heard about it. What they might not know is that it didn’t just happen recently — the abuse in this case took place a year ago, and the victim is now filing suit against the TSA. I wrote about it at my blog, Abombazine, and am re-posting here.

I’d like to say I’m shocked at this incident, because the crimes committed by the TSA were so egregious, but unfortunately, I’m not. (I also know most people don’t give a shit. “Just get me to my flight on time!”)

From Raw Story:

Disabled woman beaten bloody by TSA agents after becoming confused and afraid at security checkpoint

Oh, and our good friend Sai has already FOIA’d the video.

(Photo of Hannah Cohen courtesy of WREG)

TSA mocks blind man

No matter how often we hear these stories, one after another after another after another, for years now, each new outrage is still infuriating. No matter how low you think the TSA can go, it always goes lower.

Thus we have this story about a blind man named Joe Nerney being mocked and ridiculed by TSA agents — plural — at Bradley International Airport in Windsor Locks, Connecticut. According to this account from WTNH, Nerney says he travels all over the world as a professional musician and that the TSA is usually accommodating. But not this time:

Joe has been blind since birth and he needs to be guided through the security machines, but on Thursday while clearing security at Bradley, the TSA agent was condescending, telling him to stand on the yellow line that he could not see. When he finished the checkpoint, they told him he had to go back in.

“I kind of got pushed back in I still wasn’t stepping on the yellow lines so my friend came in and kind of guided my feet toward the yellow line,” said Nerney.

But it doesn’t end there. It wasn’t just the one sadistic agent who insisted Nerney stand on yellow footprints he obviously couldn’t see. Other TSA agents got in on the action:

On this day as he felt his way out of the machine, he says the TSA agents were mocking him.

“I got out of the machine, but for some reason the TSA guys thought it was funny and they were laughing about it,” said Nerney.

This kind of thing should never happen. I don’t want to hear claims about “a few bad apples” and all the usual garbage that TSA apologists throw out there. Only a sick, twisted, sadistic shit ridicules a disabled person. And you can bet this isn’t the only time these agents have behaved this way. It’s just the only time we happened to find out about it.

How many times do we need to say it? How many instances of abuse — thousands of them, well catalogued — do people need to read before they get it through their heads?

The TSA is an out-of-control, criminal agency that abuses people with impunity. And as long as people keep flying, and keep putting up with this abuse, nothing will change.

Sai tests legality of TSA’s new scanner policy

TSA activist and friend of the blog Sai, about whom we’ve written many times (plug “Sai” into the search box to get caught up), has already done so much to try to fight the abuses of the Transportation Security Administration. And here he is doing more. This guy, like Jon Corbett, is indefatigable.

Because I’m a little late with this post, and because Edward Hasbrouck has already so thoroughly covered Sai’s latest case, I’m going to excerpt some of Ed’s reporting and direct you to his website where you can read the complete entry. Here’s how it starts:

The real test of whether the TSA is above the law isn’t whether TSA or DHS officials, flacks, or lobbyists claim that there are legal procedures which (hypothetically) permit judicial oversight of TSA actions. The real test is what happens when real people object to specific conduct by TSA staff and contractors, or private parties such as airlines acting at the behest of the TSA, and ask the courts to review and decide whether the TSA or its minions are breaking the law or violating the US Constitution.

Nobody has done more to test the real-world limits of TSA lawlessness than our friend Sai, who has been waging a one-person, pro se legal crusade against the TSA for its disregard of the Constitution and of a variety of Federal laws providing for transparency, fairness, and due process. Sai’s pending lawsuits against the TSA include one of the most important challenges anyone has made to the TSA’s claims of authority for secret lawmaking, as discussed below.

Remarkably, and unlike most of those aggrieved by TSA general disregard for the law as well as more specific misconduct, Sai has even had some success. But that limited success gives a sense of just how outrageous is the TSA’s disregard for the law, and how far it has to go before the courts will rein it in.

As I said, you can go over to Ed’s excellent site, called Papers Please, to get the full story. Warning that it’s white font on black background, which burns my retinas, but maybe you’ll find it easier to tolerate. (Apparently there’s a way on some computers to change the colors, so if you can do that, more power to you.)

Congratulations once again to Sai for his dogged and profound work in doing battle with this obnoxious agency. We wish him all good luck. You can also get detailed information directly from Sai here and help him out financially if you can. Here’s more detailed information from Sai about the current case.

Sai receives TSA documents through FOIA

UPDATE BELOW.

At TSA News we’ve written several times about an intrepid, indefatigable young man named Sai. He has been forced to tangle with the TSA more than once, when the agency’s workers have bullied, harassed, and illegally detained him. Here’s the first post we did on him, here’s the second, and here’s the third.

In a nutshell, Sai is disabled — he has a neurological disorder that makes speaking difficult — and requires medication. The TSA taunted him, detained him, and denied him his medical liquids.

Now Sai is once again asking for your help. I’m going to let him tell you in his own words:

I FOIA’d the TSA for all of their policies & procedures (& more) in March 2013. I litigated that starting Jan 2014, and am just now getting (interim) responsive documents on it.

The interim response alone is 1400 pages. I’d like assistance in analyzing & publishing it all.

As a taste, one of the documents I got is TSA Management Directive 100.4, “Transportation Security Searches” version 2012-01-25.

Below are some of the differences between the 2009-09-01 version (disclosed in the Switzer declaration in Bierfeldt v Napolitano), and version 2012-01-25 (disclosed to me per my FOIA litigation — to my knowledge, the first disclosure).

You are welcome to use the [documents] however you like, on the sole condition of clear attribution to me w/link (Sai, http://s.ai/tsa).

Sai sent me the docs along with a series of excerpts from them using different-colored fonts to distinguish between the original versions and the revised versions. But because this blogging platform doesn’t allow for differently colored fonts, I can’t reprint everything he sent me and have it make sense. I’d have to go through every paragraph substituting strikethroughs — like these — in the original versions and then print the new versions, thus indicating which words the TSA had added or subtracted. Sorry, but I’m not as indefatigable as Sai.

So I’ll just point out some examples that caught my eye and leave it to you to contact Sai yourself if you’d like to help him go through the documents.

Here’s the TSA’s old version defining an administrative search:

“Administrative Search: A search conducted as part of a regulatory plan in furtherance of a specified non-law enforcement government purpose, such as to determine compliance with TSA regulations or to prevent the carriage of threat items or entry of an unauthorized person into the sterile area or on board an aircraft.”

And here’s the new version:

“Administrative Search: A search conducted without a warrant as part of a regulatory plan in furtherance of a specified non-law enforcement government purpose, such as to determine compliance with TSA regulations or to prevent the carriage of threat items or entry of an unauthorized person into the sterile area or to screen passengers entering any public conveyance.”

The words “without a warrant” and “any public conveyance” have been added. Our readers already know that the TSA has always claimed the power to search “any public conveyance” (see VIPR), but most people still don’t know it. Now you can see it in black and white. (“Without a warrant” has always been the case since the weasely term “administrative search” was dreamed up by lawyers, because, meh, Fourth Amendment, Schmourth Amendment.)

The TSA is also now claiming the right to search your reading materials. Yep, books, pamphlets, personal documents — no matter how personal those documents are — you name it, the TSA now claims the right to conduct a warrantless search on your personal, private information. This claim is new. Up to this point, though many TSA agents have gone through people’s personal documents, it’s been illegal for them to do so (see Steven Bierfeldt). Now, it would appear, by magic, it’s suddenly okay.

Inquisition, anyone?

Here’s that section, which Sai indicates is new:

“During a search, it may be necessary to read textual materials, for example, any written material or other media that may provide information about potential threats. Searches may properly include the reading of textual materials if necessary to rule out the presence of a threat.”

I would like someone to tell me how TSA clerks are going to determine whether a novel, a checkbook, a poem, an e-reader, or any other “textual materials” we might be carrying could be construed as a threat.

Or how about flashcards? The TSA harassed college student Nicholas George, and with the help of the local police, had him handcuffed and held in a jail cell for nearly five hours and questioned by the FBI, because he had Arabic-language flashcards in his backpack.

He said he was in the secondary screening area for about a half hour before a TSA supervisor arrived and began questioning him in a “hostile and aggressive manner.”

Noting that George had a book titled “Rogue Nation: American Unilateralism and the Failure of Good Intentions,” the supervisor asked him a series of questions, including “Who did 9/11?” and “Do you know what language he spoke?” The supervisor then held up the flash cards and said, “Do you see why these cards are suspicious?” George said.

Yeah, just what we want: TSA clerks with an attitude and fake training looking over our reading material and assessing whether we’re fit to fly or not.

The TSA finally settled with Nick George, by the way, after a years-long legal battle. Will that stop them from doing something similar again? We already know the answer is no.

Just ask psychologist Kevin Boatner:

In a formal complaint he filed with the agency afterward, he said he was pulled out of line and detained for 29 minutes as agents thumbed through his checkbook and examined his clients’ clinical notes, his cellphone, and other belongings.

His clients’ clinical notes! Do you realize the personal information that would be contained therein?

Or maybe you could ask Kathy Parker of Elkton, Maryland, who was hauled aside so the TSA could go through her wallet, her receipts, and her checkbook:

Two Philadelphia police officers joined at least four TSA officers who had gathered around her. After conferring with the TSA screeners, one of the Philadelphia officers told her he was there because her checks were numbered sequentially, which she says they were not.
“It’s an indication you’ve embezzled these checks,” she says the police officer told her. He also told her she appeared nervous. She hadn’t before that moment, she says.
She protested when the officer started to walk away with the checks. “That’s my money,” she remembers saying. The officer’s reply? “It’s not your money.”

The TSA continues to harass people and continues to tout its repeatedly — mind-numbingly repeatedly — discredited practices towards that end. And people continue to fly.

Again, contact Sai directly if you’d like to see any of the 1,400 pages of documents.

UPDATE: Sai has just posted the documents with the differently colored fonts at a publicly available Google doc.